🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to find the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.