🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves around the globe. Lawmakers, campaigners, and guardians are monitoring intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Movement

In Europe, a rising group of countries are moving toward comparable measures.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the PM arguing that phones and networks are "robbing our children's innocence". Legislation could be formalized next year.
• Norway is planning to enforce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is developing a digital wallet to verify the user details of social media users. Authorities have suggested that an Australia-style ban could be "an tools in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has urged the legislature to enact a proposal lifting the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has suggested a related move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Dutch government has urged guardians to prevent their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has adopted a non-binding motion supporting a ban for minors without guardian approval is provided. Even though it warns of the "addictive" quality of these services, the resolution does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age restriction is a useful starting point," said a leading MEP driving the resolution.

The UK: A Cautious Approach

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a potential ban, stating that "no measure is being dismissed" but insisting any policy must be "grounded in strong evidence".

Earlier, interest built behind a bill to impose restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the government pledged to further research the topic.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. One foundation established by the loved ones of a girl who was lost after encountering disturbing social media material contends that a blanket age ban may not improve online safety and could create a "cliff edge" of harm when young people become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to design tools that are appropriate and fit for young users," commented a influential child protection advocate.

America: A Decentralized Landscape

Stateside, regulation is primarily occurring at the local government level due to national stalemate.

• Utah mandates parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a measure banning those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a law capping teenagers to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with extra access dependent on parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced laws requiring guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media profiles.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from various politicians to copy the Australian lead, a US-wide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Global Perspectives

Apart from the West, further states are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

But, world bodies adopt a more nuanced tone. A major UN agency has advised that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could have unintended consequences". The organization notes that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to prioritize safety.

As this global discussion unfolds, the policies of Australia and its followers indicate that states globally are no longer willing to delay for platforms to self-regulate.