🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. As time has passed, an observance that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has adopted a commercial tone, expanding to include functions where Black people are remunerated to address white audiences about hidden biases and “allyship”. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests sparked an increase in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The surge has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The History of Black History Month

Initially celebrated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in October in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The period has transformed since its inception, placing less emphasis on the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and greater focus on notable African descendants in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the month is commemorated is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a good lesson in how co-option leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the point of it, which is to confront systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the Britain, a revitalized conservative movement in the guise of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we witnessed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a elected representative feels emboldened to say that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. At the same time, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in Europe as a whole.

In the US, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been taken, often successfully, to the highest courts of the state. A drive to erase African American heritage and narrative from the historical documents is ongoing. One of the former president's early administrative commands aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Given these circumstances, the observance symbolises how insufficiently it can be effective if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered commemorations of contributions in the past, rather than challenging the situation of the present. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is separated from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. An academic expert, a prof at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the month. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month becomes a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Figuring out how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a urge to just do away with observances such as Black History Month entirely, believing they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an era that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and heritage of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an foundation that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed throughout the annual calendar (as various establishments are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not evade political issues, and leaves space for individuals, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is mere awareness of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Establishments who celebrate it should not be reassured with the neutral terminology of “unconscious bias” and awareness of “microaggressions”, but challenged by the risks that impact society if fight against prejudice is not taken seriously. To summarize, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and adaptive. Perhaps an total re-identification is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.